• Home
    • Contact Me
  • Statement of Faith
  • Prayer
  • This Is Me…
  • 30 Random Things About Me…

Gone Fishin'

~ …“Come after me, and I will make you fishers for men!”

Gone Fishin'

Monthly Archives: February 2011

The Bride of Christ’s Inner, Upper, and Outer Garments

13 Sunday Feb 2011

Posted by Rev. Nadine Drayton-Keen in Bible Prophecy

≈ 13 Comments

Tags

'abnet, 'ezowr, Bride of Christ, chagowr, chaluq, covering, girdle, himation, kethnoeth, kittel, kittuna, loincloth, mantle, real shirt, robe, simlah, spiritual nakedness, tsiytsith, under tunic, waistband, Wedding Banquet, wedding garment

She has been permitted to dress in fine (radiant) linen, dazzling and white–for the fine linen is (signifies, represents) the righteousness (the upright, just, and godly living, deeds, and conduct, and right standing with God) of the saints (God’s holy people). (Revelation 19:8, AMP)

I will greatly rejoice in the Lord, my soul will exult in my God; for He has clothed me with the garments of salvation, He has covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decks himself with a garland, and as a bride adorns herself with her jewels. (Isaiah 61:10, AMP)

In order to understand why the Prophet Isaiah speaks of holy and righteous garments, in particular the “garments of salvation” and a “robe of righteousness,” a working knowledge of the ancient traditional Jewish body garments is necessary. According to Alfred Edersheim in The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (Book III, Chapter 26, “Christ’s Personal Appearance,”1883), Edersheim says that there are six very common items in Jesus the Christ’s day that that Lord  Himself would have been wearing. Two of these six items actually are not clothing, but rather number (1) is a pair of sandals, and number (2) is headgear. The remaining four items are: (3) a loincloth,  “real shirt,” pair of pants or undergarments; (4) a girdle, sash, or waistband; (5) a long shirt or tunic; and (6) a mantle, cloak, robe, or shawl.

Now, since the Holy Bible teaches us that nakedness (our exposed spiritual condition) is a disgrace, then the godly reasons why we wear clothing today are to cover our spiritual uncleanness and our nudity (cf. Genesis 3:7, 10-11, 21; Exodus 32:25; 1 Samuel 18:4; and 2 Samuel 18:11, etc.). In fact, it is because of Adam’s fall that we have spiritual uncleanness (sin). His fall also is the reason why we know that we must be careful that our sexual mores do not offend others, and the way we do this is by making sure we are wearing enough clothes, especially making sure that we are covering all the taboo places.

People having to wear clothes started in the Garden of Eden with Adam and Eve. Back then and back there, after their spiritual eyes were opened, Adam made a loin-covering for them called chagowr, which in the Hebrew language means a loincloth, which is a type covering that shields from immodesty (cf. Genesis 3:7). This loin-covering should not be confused with the ‘ezowr of Jeremiah 13:1, for an ‘ezowr is a waistband or waistcloth, which is more like a sash or belt used to hold undergarments in place; however, like the chagowr, the ‘ezowr is considered to be an innermost piece of clothing.

Consequently, the loincloth became a customary piece of clothing, at least during the Jewish people’s earliest periods, for during that time the men of all social levels wore the loincloth. Then, at a much later date, the linen shirt, which was worn beneath the upper tunic and the outer garment, displaces the future priestly underpants (michnasayim)—linen breeches worn by the High Priest and priests that extended from their waist to their knees. They wore these pants as a covering for their nakedness (cf. Exodus 28:42)—and, as already mentioned, these pants displaced the loincloth.

Before we leave the Garden of Eden, there are two more pieces of clothing to mention. Even though it is not directly stated, the fact that Adam’s loincloths are called a chagowr (a loin-covering) suggests that Adam had to keep this loincloth from dropping, so he must have had a built-in girdle or sash, which would be a second necessary body garment. The third necessary body garment that can be traced back to the Garden of Eden is the “coat” of animal skins, called the kethoneth, which God makes for the fallen Adam and Eve (cf. Genesis 3:21). Like the later kethoneth, and by the way kethoneth means “cover,” this item also is called a tunic, shirt, robe, and/or garment. Also, like the later kethoneth, this piece of clothing will cover Adam and Eve from their neck down to their feet.

Now, even though Adam already has made loincloths with possible sashes out of fig leaves, he still is in for an unexpected eye-opener.  As already stated, God has to make Adam and Eve more garments, and they are not made from fig leaves. Their garments are made out of animal skins. Therefore, the fact that God has to make them more clothes, and the fact that His clothes will cover more than the couple’s private parts underscore this Divine Truth: Human righteousness can never cover spiritual or heavenly righteousness. This truth is exactly why our bridal attire of the future will consist of the garments of salvation and the robe of righteousness. In other words, whatever righteousness we might earn from the “good” works that we do on earth and from our completion of God’s sanctifying process, our righteousness still will not surpass the righteousness of Christ, which is why we must wear clothing/coverings, even in Heaven! Anyway, so far, we see that three of the six most common Jewish body garments originated in the Garden of Eden.

Next, around the time when Moses and the Israelites were in the wilderness, God commands Aaron and his sons to wear holy garments that confirm the fact that they were anointed, consecrated, and sanctified by God. The garments that the priests would wear also confirm their righteous standing with God—a righteousness that is equivalent to the New Testament saints being justified or clothed in Christ’s righteousness. Only while clothed in these holy garments would the Tabernacle and later Temple priests be allowed to minister in the priest’s office and/or come to the altar in the Holy Place (cf. Exodus 28:41-43; Exodus 29:29).

Interesting enough, Aaron (a High Priest) and his sons (priests) wore the same type of garments. Those priestly garments that relate to the Bride of Christ’s attire will be the clothing mentioned in the next two paragraphs.

Once again, Aaron and his sons wore a pair of linen underpants called michnasayim, which were made of fine white linen, and these underpants extended from their neck to their feet (cf. Exodus 28:42). Aaron and his sons also wore a kethoneth made of pure linen. This tunic covered their body from their neck to their feet, and it had sleeves reaching to their wrists. The only difference between the High Priest’s tunic and the priests’ tunic is that the High Priest’s kethoneth was embroidered (cf. Exodus 28:39-40). Next is the “girdle,” or sash, or belt called avnet or ‘abnet, which is made of fine linen or leather and is worn around the waist or under the breast. Sometimes, this “girdle” had a pouch in which to keep money. For the High Priest this “girdle” is embroidered with fine linen, blue, purple and scarlet threads (cf. Exodus 28:39 and 39:29), and the priests’ “girdle” is plain.

Lastly, Aaron and his sons wore a kittel, which is a white linen robe that looks somewhat like a bathrobe. The white color symbolizes purity. Jewish men who were not priests, on special occasions, also wore a kittel to signify purity, humility, holiness, and new beginnings. Traditionally, a Jewish man first wears a kittel on his wedding day, thereafter on Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Passover, and so did the Tabernacle and Temple priests. Finally, a Jewish man also would wear a kittel as a burial shroud.

Having laid that foundation about regularly worn ancient Jewish clothing, it is time to look at the four most traditional Jewish body garments. Based on Old and New Testament Scriptures, also Rabbinic literature, these four most traditional Jewish body garments are: (1) the Hebrew chaluq and the Rabbinic kittuna; (2) the kethoneth, in the Hebrew language, and the chiton in the Greek language; (3) the simlah, in the Hebrew language, and the himation, in the Greek language, which also are similar to the Hebrew tallith and the Rabbinic goltha; and (4) the Hebrew chagowr, or ‘ezowr, or ‘abnet, which respectively are a loincloth or girdle, or a belt . . . sash . . . waistband . . . waistcloth or waistcoat.

The most common Jewish body garments also were called Inner or Innermost Garment, Under Tunic, or Under Garment; Upper Garment, Second or Upper Tunic, or Underdress; and Outer Garment or Cloak, Mantle, Robe, or Shawl. These titles also will be used from here forward.

The Innermost or Under Garment, also called chaluq, is a rather long “undergarment,” usually reaching down to the knees, and, like the displaced loincloth called chagowr, the chaluq is a piece of clothing that is nearest to the skin. Chaluq also is a very close-fitting garment that resembles a shirt; indeed, chaluq is translated as “real shirt” or Under Tunic. It only has openings for the neck and arms, and it extends to the feet. For some people, the chaluq or Under Tunic usually doubled as undergarments, since wearing loincloths was not a universal practice. This garment, however, is a necessary piece of clothing not only for a teacher but also for anyone who plans on standing up in the synagogue to read and “targum” (translate) the Scriptures.

Now, Jewish men and women wore the same kind of Innermost or Under Garment. Once again, this Innermost or Under Garment is the chaluq or the Rabbinic kittuna, a close-fitting piece of clothing that resembles a shirt. Jewish men and women also wore a similar girdle or waistband (chagowr and/or ‘ezowr in the Hebrew language, and zone in the Greek language), which held the chaluq or the Rabbinic kittuna close to the body. When folded, the waistband also served not only as a belt to hold up flowing garments but also, since this waistband was hollow, it served as a pocket in which to carry money. Concerning the chaluq or kittuna, this Innermost or Under Garment often was made of wool, cotton, or linen. When the Innermost or Under Garment was made of linen, it then could be used as either a nightshirt or a gown. When a person only wore the linen Under Garment, the individual was described as being naked (cf. 1 Samuel 19:24; Isaiah 20:2-4; Mark 14:51; John 21:7). Symbolically, this garment represents the imputed righteousness of Christ that now has been implanted within the saints.

The kethoneth is a Second Tunic or Underdress worn over the chaluq but under the Outer Garment,  and the kethoneth usually was woven throughout without any seam. The kethoneth is “long shirt” with short or long sleeves, generally long sleeves, and it fell either to the knees or ankles. If designed for a “dress” occasion, it reached almost to the ground. The kethoneth was most often made of wool or linen, and it had an opening for the neck and arms, and it often was belted (by a sash) at the waist.

This particular Upper Garment has been translated wrongly as “coat,” for example, in Genesis 37:31-33, Exodus 28:4, Matthew 5:40, Luke 6:29, and John 19:23; or as “coats of skins” Genesis 3:21 and Song of Solomon 5:3; or as “coat of many colours” Genesis 37:3 and 23; or as garment in Jude 1:23; or as clothes in Mark 14:63. The “coat,” “garment,” and “clothes” translations are wrong, simply because the Old Testament Hebrew word kethoneth and the New Testament Greek word chiton both mean a tunic or a robe! Thus, when “two coats” were worn (cf. Luke 3:11; see also Matthew 10:10; and Mark 6:9), the real meaning is that they wore two tunics or two robes. Generally, people only wore one kethoneth or chiton. Moreover, a kethoneth or chiton symbolizes poverty, and this truth is why Christ instructs His disciples, whom He is about to send to the House of Israel, to not take “two coats.”

Lastly, there is the simlah, which is a “cloak” or “mantle” in the King James Version, as well as in the Revised Version (both British and American), and simlah also is used in the plural for “garments” or “clothes” in general. The Outer Garment simlah (from the Old Testament) is very much like the Hebrew word for shawl, which is tallith (in the Talmud; beged in the Old Testament [cf. Numbers 15:38-40]).  The one difference between the simlah and tallith is that the  simlah appears in some cases to have been a loose robe. In most other cases, simlah refers to a large square piece of cloth with fringes (in Old Testament tsiytsith; from the Torah, tzitzit) that are on the end of its four corners.

It, however, is important to note here that fringes were attached to the corners of EVERY square garment! Nevertheless, a simlah is like a modern shawl, for it also could be wrapped around the person, with more or less taste and comfort.

The Outer Garment, cloak, mantle, robe or shawl (simlah in the Hebrew language, and himation in the Greek language), generally was made of animal skin or wool, with openings for the arms. It was worn draped over one or both shoulders. Since a man also was considered naked if he wasn’t wearing his cloak, he was forbidden to lend or pledge this Outer Garment. Furthermore, at night he removed it and used it as a blanket (cf. Exodus 22:27; Deuteronomy 22:17). Lastly, this Outer Garment, or cloak, or mantle, or robe, or shawl, was worn over the kethoneth or chiton; it often was used as a cloak, and it frequently was used by poor people and by travelers, as their only covering at night.

To hold the chaluq, kethoneth, and simlah in place, the Hebrews used a “girdle,” which is, as already stated, the ‘ezowr, the chagowr or the ‘abnet in the Hebrew language, zone in the Greek, and the sash or belt in English. The girdle/sash was a necessary and almost universal article of clothing, which is why it was commonly used with all the garments worn by most people back in Jesus the Christ’s day, Jewish and Gentile. Besides meaning modesty, the “girdle” also means righteousness. Indeed, in Isaiah 11:5, the prophet says the following about the Jewish Messiah: “Righteousness shall be the belt of His loins, and faithfulness the belt of His waist.” This verse essentially means that as the “girdle” has a controlling and binding influence over all clothing, the qualities of righteousness and faithfulness also have a controlling and binding influence over all of Christ’s purposes and actions. Indeed, Christ is described in this verse as, “…Son of Man, clothed with a robe which reached to His feet and with a girdle of gold about His breast” (Revelation 1:13, AMP). It sounds like even the Lord wears a girdle (or will wear one in the future) as part of His holy garments.

Now, when the Bride of Christ is raptured, she will be wearing the four most ancient but common Jewish clothing. For sure, Christ gives the Bride of Christ the linen “garment,” here referring to the raptured saints’ righteous acts or deeds (cf. Revelation 19:8), which is why the plural form of righteousness is used in the Word of God, because the Bride’s linen “garment” represents Her (every Body of Christ member’s) own external versions of the righteousness and holiness that are on the inside of Christ. In other words, the imputed righteousness of Christ not only has covered the saints but also has been implanted within each saint. As a result, every raptured saint has displayed that implanted righteousness as “good” works. Christ’s Bride, therefore, is given the white linen “garment” to wear because of Her holy and righteous deeds, which each member of the Bride accomplished while on earth.

In fact, just as Aaron and his sons wore the same type of garments that the High Priest wore, New Testament believers (a type of priest like the sons of Aaron) will wear the same kind of priestly garments as their High Priest, Jesus the Christ, wears (i.e., garments of salvation and a robe of righteousness). This last statement means that  everything on Jesus the Christ, believers’ High Priest, will resemble the holy garments that the High Priests and priests wore, and by extension, will resemble the Bride of Christ’s garments. That is to say, Jesus the Christ and raptured believers’ linen garments will be righteous and holy garments, because everything the High Priests and priests wore that was made of linen speaks of essential righteousness and holiness!

Sons of Aaron’s garments are: girdle, kethoneth, and headdress (Exodus 28:40)

Now, since Aaron the High Priest and his sons wear a linen girdle or sash/belt called ‘abnet (of fine linen embroidered in blue, purple and scarlet for the High Priest and white, twined linen for the priests), and since the Prophet Isaiah says that righteousness and faithfulness will be the girdle of Christ’s loins (cf. Isaiah 11:5), then the girdle also symbolizes Christ’s righteousness that encircles and closely and inseparably binds every believer to Him, just like His intrinsic righteousness and faithfulness characteristics follow Him as closely and inseparably as a tight-fitting garment does to the body it is encircling. The closeness and binding nature of His righteousness and faithfulness, then, means that the Bride of Christ comes to Heaven already wearing Christ’s righteousness—righteousness that believers did not and could not earn by doing “good” works.

Indeed, Christ is the raptured saints’ “girdle” that encircles them—justifies believers so that they are in right standing with God. Since the “girdle” is often the closest piece of clothing to the body, then Christ’s girdle, His imputed righteousness, represents the righteous seeds that are implanted and cultivated within His Bride, which, by the aid of the Holy Spirit, eventually produce the fruit of the Holy Spirit in Her—will bring forth Her “good” fruits or Her holy and righteous deeds, as well as Her obedience and faithfulness to Christ. Then too, Christ’s “girdle,” as do all biblical girdles, symbolizes a readiness and preparedness position that His Bride must continuously be in, like that of a warrior prepared and ready for battle. Additionally, the “girdle” represents the Bride’s patient, humble and willing to serve Christ character. These truths are why the raptured Bride is allowed to wear Her fine white linen garment (cf. Revelation 19:8).

Additionally, as one of their holy garments, the High Priest and priests also wear a fine white linen garment like that which Christ and His Bride  also wear. The Upper Garment or Second Tunic that Christ’s Bride receives permission to wear is the Upper Garment or Second Tunic, also called the Underdress. In the Hebrew language, this garment is the kethoneth, and it is called the chiton in the Greek language.

Christ also wears this Upper or Underdress Garment, which is worn over the chaluq. The Apostle John writes:

Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took His garments and made four parts, one share for each soldier, and also the tunic (the long shirt-like undergarment). But the tunic was seamless, woven [in one piece] from the top throughout. So they said to one another, Let us not tear it, but let us cast lots to decide whose it shall be. This was to fulfill the Scripture, They parted My garments among them, and for My clothing they cast lots. So the soldiers did these things. ~ John 19:23-24, AMP

In the above verses, the Amplified Bible Version (AMP) uses “garments,” in verse 23, which in the Greek language of the King James Version (KJV) also is “garments,” and this English word is translated from the Greek word himation (meaning a robe, cloak, mantle, or shawl); the AMP also uses the word tunic, which in the KJV is “coat,” and these English words are translated from the Greek word chiton (meaning a tunic, undergarment, garment, or vestment); and lastly, the AMP word “garments” in verse 24 is the KJV word “raiment,” and these two English words are translated from the Greek word himation (meaning a robe, cloak, mantle, or shawl).

The point of the above paragraph is to show how, from John 19:23-24, in which the Apostle John is speaking about Jesus the Christ’s clothing, it is clear to see that at the time of the Lord’s crucifixion He had been wearing the Upper or Underdress Garment (the chiton or tunic), under the Outer Garment or himation (meaning cloak, mantle, shawl, or robe). Traditionally, this tunic also is white linen, which means that the Lord’s tunic (the white + the linen) again symbolizes His righteousness. Moreover, His righteousness cannot be divided, for the Roman soldiers cast lots for His tunic instead of tearing it into pieces like they tore His Outer Garment (mantle, shawl, cloak, or robe)! The fact that the Roman soldiers did not rip up the Lord’s Upper Garment implies that a person is either wholly righteous or not righteous at all, for, once again, righteousness CANNOT be divided!

Now, since Jesus was both a Jewish teacher and believers’ High Priest, many scholars tend to think that instead of the himation, the Lord more than likely was wearing a Rabbinic goltha, which is similar to the Hebrew tallith. A tallith is worn over the chaluq (the Innermost or Under Garment that, according to some scholars, also is woven without any seams).

Based on the fact that the Roman soldiers had removed the Lord’s Upper and Outer garments, it might seem like the Lord was literally naked on the Cross—that He wasn’t wearing a thing. Yet, it is more probable that the Lord was wearing a loincloth, which, probably is the reason why when He removed His Outer Garment at the Last Supper, as He prepared to wash His disciples’ feet, He girded His loins with a towel. The Apostle John records the following about the Lord, saying He: “Got up from supper, took off His garments, and taking a [servant’s] towel, He fastened it around His waist” (John 13:4, AMP). So, after removing His “garments”—His Outer Garment and the sash/belt/girdle that held it together—the Lord then puts a “towel” around His waist, instead of the removed sash/belt/girdle, before He starts to wash His disciples’ feet. The “towel” (linen cloth), thus, now becomes His righteous and faithful ‘ezowr (sash or girdle) that not only closely and inseparably holds His undergarments next to His body, but also, when He uses this “towel” to wipe their feet, covers His disciples in His righteousness and closely and inseparably binds them even that much more to Him.

Furthermore, the fact that the soldiers stripped Christ of His Outer Garment and Second Tunic doesn’t mean that Christ was literally naked. Scriptures and Rabbinic literature declare that a Jewish man is considered “naked” if he gives away or is without his Outer Garment, as well as considered “naked” if he has removed his Upper Garment or Second Tunic, even though an Under Garment or Under Tunic, which doubles as a night shirt, would still be there.

The point is that it very well could be that the Lord was wearing the traditional (1) chagowr, a loincloth; (2) a chaluq, the Under Tunic; (3) an ‘ezowr, a girdle; and (4) a goltha, an Outer Garment. That He possibly would be wearing all of the linen clothing like a High Priest would wear to a sacrificial offering makes real sense, since Christ is about to become the sacrificial Lamb.

Consequently, because of what Christ is sacrificing, God would not let His Son hang stark naked on the Cross. After all, Christ has come into this world to take away the sins of this world. That, at His crucifixion, He has taken on all of the sins of the world in and of itself means that He now is to God the Father a spiritually naked—unclean—person. Thus, if God did not leave Adam and Eve’s literally naked and spiritually unclean bodies without some kind of covering, it stands to reason that He would not allow His Son to be spiritually and literally naked on the Cross. Therefore, it is highly probable that Christ had been stripped down to His loincloth!

Christ was fully dressed and wearing the four most important body clothing, when the soldiers took Him out of the Garden of Gethsemane. Once again, those pieces of holy clothing on Jesus the Christ were: the chaluq, the Under Tunic or “real shirt” of a fine white linen, held together by a fine white linen ‘ezowr (girdle), the kethoneth or chiton (woven without any seams longer tunic that reached His feet), also of fine white linen, which He wore over His chaluq; and the himation (or possibly the goltha or tallith), of a fine white linen, as well. As mentioned before, since the goltha in Rabbinic literature is the garment the High Priest wore, then it is more than likely the Lord was wearing this garment, too, and His is in white linen.

This somewhat detailed discussion on the most common ancient Jewish garments, the High Priest and priests’ garments, and Jesus the Christ’s garments have been the background for the final critical analysis. It is very important for believers to understand that the white linen Upper or Underdress Garment, which the Bridegroom (Christ) gives His Bride (New Testament believers/saints) permission to wear, is worn over the Innermost or Under Garment and under the Outermost robe (or kittel). This white linen garment mentioned in Revelation 19:8, thus, symbolizes the righteousness of the saints—the saints’ own intrinsic righteousness, which is obtained by way of the Holy Spirit’s sanctifying work in each individual who cooperates with Him, and by each individual’s own “good” works. In other words, this white linen garment only goes to the believers who prepared themselves and/or made themselves ready for their Bridegroom’s coming by not committing any spiritual adultery! That is to say that Christ’s imputed righteousness has been implanted in them, and those implanted seeds have grown to fruition, culminating in the production of bushels of choice spiritual fruits.

Nevertheless, before the Bride is raptured, She knows that the threat of spiritual adultery continues to be a ubiquitous temptation and, therefore, a serious option for many. This truth is why the Apostle Paul’s words also warn today’s believers about being mindful of the consequences for committing spiritual adultery. He writes:

For I am zealous for you with a godly eagerness and a divine jealousy, for I have betrothed you to one Husband, to present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But [now] I am fearful, lest that even as the serpent beguiled Eve by his cunning, so your minds may be corrupted and seduced from wholehearted and sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For [you seem readily to endure it] if a man comes and preaches another Jesus than the One we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the [Spirit] you [once] received or a different gospel from the one you [then] received and welcomed; you tolerate [all that] well enough! (2 Corinthians 11:2-4, AMP)

In these perilous times, the biblical passage that should come to mind here, which supports the above-mentioned spiritual truths about the Bride of Christ needing to remain spiritually chaste, is Isaiah 61:10. Though this verse is about God’s Bride, Israel, Isaiah 61:10 still corresponds with the Bride of Christ passage found in Revelation 19:8, because they both present the image of a Bride who is without any inward spot or wrinkle and dressed in fine white linen. In Revelation 19:8, however, the Bride of Christ is given her garment for Her to dress herself in this fine white linen clothing, which, once again, refers to the righteousness of the saints. Each member of the Body of Christ, thus, has earned his or her fine white linen wedding gift garment, by his or her own actions that are righteous and faithful. In contrast, God, in Isaiah 61:10, is the One dressing His chosen people. He is putting His garments of salvation and robe of righteousness on them, which sounds like God is dressing them in the Lord’s imputed righteousness and justification.

This last point is why Isaiah 61:10 also brings to mind Isaiah 52:1. The Isaiah 52:1 Scripture is God’s exhortation to His chosen people. God urges: “Awake, awake, clothe yourself in your strength, O Zion; Clothe yourself in your beautiful garments.” The difference between the two Isaiah verses is that, in Isaiah 52:1, God’s people dress themselves in their own idea of fine linen garments, as opposed to Isaiah 61:10, where God is the One who dresses His people with His garments of salvation and the robe of righteousness, like they already were bridegrooms and brides.

The point here is that when God personally dresses His people/wedding guests, or gives them the appropriate attire, their garments are indeed righteous, pure, and beautiful; however, when His people/wedding guests dress themselves in their own version of righteous, pure, and beautiful garments, their clothing might or might not meet God’s standards. Furthermore, Isaiah 61:10’s verse also is about those who wear the Lord’s righteousness, which God has dressed them in, and about the fact that He puts them in His garments so that they will be admired by all the nations, just not for themselves, but rather so that they can show the redeeming power of the LORD to everyone.

While the Isaiah verses pertain to the Hebrews, another Scripture that comes to mind that has to do with New Testament saved by Grace and hopeful to become the Bride of Christ believers is Matthew 22:11. This verse concerns a wedding guest who shows up to the wedding banquet wearing inappropriate clothing. In the Wedding Banquet Parable (Matthew 22:1-14), God invites some last minute, 11th-hour guests, some of whom were “bad” (of a bad nature or bad condition, spiritually speaking) and “good” (of a good nature or good condition, spiritually speaking) [cf. Matthew 22:10]. The King, who is God, also had provided the appropriate attire for all of His invited guests (possibly the Jewish kittel, a white line robe that signifies purity, holiness and new beginnings. Traditionally, Jewish priests and Jewish bridegrooms, Jewish married men, and cantors wear a kittel. Since the kittel also is used as a burial shroud, this garment then serves to remind Jewish people about mankind’s mortality and the need for teshuvah (repentance and new beginnings).

Whether the robe the King’s invited guests wear is a kittel or not, there can be no doubt that this robe will be a white linen robe, symbolizing that it also is a holy garment. Indeed, the word that the Apostle John uses in the following verses for robe is the Greek word stole, which is a garment worn by kings, priests, and people of rank! The apostle writes:

Then they were each given a long and flowing and festive white robe and told to rest and wait patiently a little while longer, until the number should be complete of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be killed as they themselves had been. (Revelation 6:11; cf. 7:13-14)

and

After this I looked and a vast host appeared which no one could count, [gathered out] of every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages. These stood before the throne and before the Lamb; they were attired in white robes, with palm branches in their hands. (Revelation 7:9)

Since the saints are members of a “royal priesthood” (cf. 1 Peter 2:9), then the white robe the Apostle John speaks about, whether a stole or a kittel, clearly will be a holy garment. Furthermore, the wedding garment has to be a holy garment too, because the particular guest in the Wedding Banquet Parable is cast out (cf. Matthew 22:11-13), forbidden to sit at the Banquet Table, even though he is invited to the banquet. The Word of God makes is clear that those who are cast into outer darkness are those who have not sought the only One who can cleanse their uncleanness with His shed blood and cover their filthy-rag righteousness with His pure righteousness.

Thus, the one guest who chose not to wear the appropriate attire (chose not to accept Christ’s imputed righteousness) not only showed his bad nature/condition—his nakedness or outward righteousness that reflected his inward lack of true spirituality, which reduced all of his righteous actions to filthy rags (cf. Isaiah 64:6)—but also he showed that he is someone who has rejected Christ’s righteousness right in front of the King (God). This guest was neither wearing God’s new garments of salvation nor the robe of righteousness (both of which Christ offers), but rather he was wearing his own filthy-spotted garments that symbolize a sin-sick world.

Still, God asks the guest how he got into the wedding hall without having on the proper clothing. If he had opened his mouth and given a response that includes a plea for forgiveness, no doubt God would have allowed him to repent and then given him the necessary clothing (cf. Zechariah 3:1-4; Isaiah 52:1 and 61:10). But since this guest remained silent, God’s judgment was all that this guest could expect.

Then too, being someone who has rejected Christ’s righteousness meant that this guest was not glowing with the redeeming power of the Lord. This guest’s appearance brings home the Divine Truth of the Wedding Banquet, which is that God calls (invites) many to participate in His Son’s wedding supper feast, but only a few of these invited folks will actually be chosen to sit at the Lord’s dinner table. To sit at this table, the chosen invitees must be wearing the garments of salvation (the Innermost and Upper Garments that prove a person has worked out his or her own salvation (makes him or herself ready/prepared [cf. Philippians 2:12]) and the robe of righteousness (a.k.a., Outer Garment or cloak, mantle, or shawl)—the outward expression of Christ’s intrinsic righteousness that He has imputed to all saints, that which He wraps around every born again, saved, and justified believer.

The final point is that in the “visible” church there will be many people sitting on pews who are not truly born again, saved, and justified. For sure, both the “bad” and the “good” are worshipping together in the institutional church, and many believers cannot tell the difference between the two (proven in the Wedding Banquet parable by the servants God sends out into the highways to invite wedding guests), which is why the Lord has to do the end-time separating!

Lastly, several end time prophecy scholars have said that they believe many “saints” will just get into Heaven with the smell of smoke on them, and that these “saints” will stand before the Lord naked . . . in this sense, literally not wearing any garments at all, for they have not lived a lifestyle that typifies righteousness and holiness. This image is supported by the words of the Apostle Paul who writes:

But if anyone builds upon the Foundation, whether it be with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, The work of each [one] will become [plainly, openly] known (shown for what it is); for the day [of Christ] will disclose and declare it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test and critically appraise the character and worth of the work each person has done. If the work which any person has built on this Foundation [any product of his efforts whatever] survives [this test], he will get his reward. But if any person’s work is burned up [under the test], he will suffer the loss [of it all, losing his reward], though he himself will be saved, but only as [one who has passed] through fire. ~ 1 Corinthians 3:12-15, AMP

These “saints” that the apostle and end time prophecy scholars speak of as just getting in to Heaven with the smell of smoke on them AND those “saints” who end-time prophecy scholars say might not have on any holy garments should make us sit up and take notice. The Word of God is clear about those “saints” who will smell like smoke, having just missed the Lake of Fire. Thus, it is not hard to see that it also might be possible that some Bride of Christ members could stand before the Lord stripped naked. To that end, this could mean that even some of the Bride of Christ might not receive the white linen garment, but rather a lesser quality bridal dress, which will permit them to sit at the banquet table. Think about it. If everyone in the Bride of Christ were worthy of wearing this white linen garment, why would Christ have to grant (consent, acknowledge, or, in the Amplified version, permit) Her the right to wear the holy garment?

If the above scenario is 100% accurate, then hopefully Christ will continue to be gracious to those of us, who fit the smell of smoke and naked description to a T, and give us the white robe to wear, even if we don’t get to wear the Bride’s white linen, which represents the saints’ righteous deeds. Something to think about, for sure!

For more details, please read my “A Contextual Analysis of Christ’s Many Called, Few Chosen Paradox” and “What Will Your RSVP Be To The King’s Invitation?” blog entries.


Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Print & PDF (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Ten Horns and The Little Horn: Good and Bad News for Edom, Moab and Ammon

06 Sunday Feb 2011

Posted by Rev. Nadine Drayton-Keen in Bible Prophecy

≈ 18 Comments

Tags

Ammon, Antichrist, bad news, Beast Empire, Byzantine Empire, Edom, end time, global leader, GOOD NEWS, harlot of Babylon, Islamic Empire, last days, Little Horn, Mahdi, Moab, Petra, Sharia Law, ten horns, Wadi-Rum

Then I wished to know the truth about the fourth beast–which was different from all the others, exceedingly terrible and shocking, whose teeth were of iron and its nails of bronze, which devoured, broke and crushed, and trampled what was left with its feet–And about the ten horns [representing kings] that were on its head, and the other horn which came up later and before which three of [the horns] fell, the horn which had eyes and a mouth that spoke great things and which looked greater than the others. As I looked, this horn made war with the saints and prevailed over them Until the Ancient of Days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the Most High [God], and the time came when the saints possessed the kingdom. Thus [the angel] said, The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all other kingdoms and shall devour the whole earth, tread it down, and break it in pieces and crush it. And as for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise; and another shall arise after them, and he shall be different from the former ones, and he shall subdue and put down three kings. ~ Daniel 7:19-24, AMP

The turmoil happening theses days in Cairo has so many people searching the Internet for information about the prophesied end times and modern-day Egypt’s role in the events that lead up to the Second Coming of the Lord. The good news is that the end-time future of Egypt, Assyria and Israel, for example, is going to be glorious. These three nations for centuries have been enemies, but in a God-orchestrated ironic twist they all will be allies in an end time Messianic League (cf. Isaiah 19:24-25, AMP).

Likewise, people are interested in knowing about Edom, Moab, and Ammon, other ancient lands whose people, like the Egyptians, have had an adversarial history with Israel. People want to know the roles Edom, Moab, and Ammon play in the events that lead up to the Second Coming of Jesus the Christ. The good news is that, in the end times, instead of modern-day Edom, Moab, and Ammon receiving destruction right away for their part in the ten-nation confederacy of Psalm 83, they will share a safe place with a nation that they have vowed to destroy—Israel. When they rebel against the Little Horn/Antichrist, God does not let the Antichrist destroy these people. God, however, does allow him to divide (assign, distribute) their lands for a price—undivided loyalty (cf. Daniel 11:39, 41).

From Scriptures, it is apparent that the ten horns (nations/populations) are in the position of authority for the first three and a half years, or before the Antichrist declares himself God and begins to persecute the Messianic Jews. Indeed, the satanic, antichrist, and anti-Semitic spirit (manifested as Islam’s Caliphate and Sharia Law) are responsible for the authority the ten horns have before the Antichrist begins to function in the prophesied global leader position, which is apparent in Prophet Daniel’s description of the Little Horn rising up among the already risen ten horns, and uprooting three of them (cf. Daniel 7:8 and 20).

At some point during the first 3½ years (the first half of the 7-year Tribulation), the Antichrist presents himself as a global leader who is a man of peace. Indeed, we see his love of peace demonstrated by the peace treaty he signs with Israel (Daniel 9:27), and again during His rise to power, which is described as the Little Horn pushing up through the 10 horns, causing 3 of the 10 to be subdued (cf. Daniel 7:24). They are subdued but not destroyed, as here “subdued” means that the Antichrist brings these 3 ruling leaders (horns) under his control through the use of powerful persuasion or convincing intimidation rather than by war.

Nevertheless, the Antichrist takes away 3 of the 10 horns’ power, subdues them, and then divides up (assigns, distributes) their lands, for a price (loyalty) [cf. Daniel 11:39, 41]. Thus, the territories of the Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites only will go to those rulers under the Antichrist who are not his antagonists.

Evidently, the Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites change their allegiance. The reason why Satan allows Edom, Moab and Ammon (now modern-day Jordan) to become members of the 10-horn confederacy and share their power with the Antichrist is probably because the current king of Jordan, King Abdullah II, is the 43rd generation direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad. Since Islam, which includes the Caliphate and Sharia Law, is the end-time religion, it is obvious that the Antichrist has to use Islam to gain control of the world and become the last human world leader. Thus, having a connection with rulers whose lineage can be traced back to the Prophet Muhammad, like King Abdullah II, gives the Antichrist an incredible influence in the world of Islam, as well as makes him the guardian of Islam’s holiest sites, including the Dome of the Rock (Masjid Qubbat As-Sakhrah) in Jerusalem and the Grand Mosque (Masjid al-Haram) in Mecca.

Furthermore, since the Antichrist is also Islamic, and the Muslims’ prophesied Mahdi, it only seems logical that he not only would have Jordan as one of his allies but also he would spare Jordan’s leaders (the Arabic leaders of Edom, Moab, and Ammon), if any Jordanian ruler is a member of Prophet Mohammad’s family. Personally, this writer believes the Antichrist doesn’t war against Edom, Moab and Ammon, because he still needs to appear as a man of peace, and because God is protecting them. Jordan always has been a place of peace and safety, and God’s people soon will need to be able to move freely through the Jordanian Wadi-Rum desert on their way to Petra, after the Antichrist breaks the treaty and wages war against them.

Now, it could be very possible that at the time of the Antichrist’s reign the rulers of Edom, Moab and Ammon will change their allegiance with the Antichrist, once they realize that they have different agendas. The Antichrist wants to control God and ultimately be Him by defeating the Lamb, but Edom, Moab and Ammon want to control and possess the land of Israel. These different agendas make it clear why the Antichrist would only want to promote those who fall in line behind him and the “god” he worships, which is why the Antichrist will divide up (assign, distribute) Edom, Moab, and Ammon to rulers who will be loyal to him.

Which is why in Revelation 17:16-18, there is now the image of the 10 horns (the original 7 plus 3 new ones who now rule over the lands of Edom, Moab, and Ammon [cf. Daniel 7:8, 20, 24 and 11:39]), the Beast, and possibly the False Prophet, who are now angry with the harlot of Babylon (angry that the harlot, the Caliphate, took the Antichrist’s economic, political and religious power with her when see moved from the Antichrist’s current capital of Jerusalem back to Mecca, where Islam, its Caliphate, and Sharia Law originated). It is clear that the Antichrist/Beast and the 10 horns are all working together to destroy the harlot of Babylon (the Caliphate, Islam, and city of Mecca [Babylon], the revived Babylon, which today is the center of Arabic culture, occult religion, economy, and politics).

By Revelation 17:16, it would seem that Satan completely has possessed the Antichrist and has given him the power and authority of the world’s nations, including the Antichrist’s Arabic 10-nation confederacy. Be that as it may, it is very clear that at this time something has happened that has changed the relationship the 10 horns, the Antichrist, and possibly the False Prophet have had with the harlot of Babylon, for they no longer have any use for the harlot, the woman who earlier is described as sitting on the scarlet Beast who has seven heads and 10 horns (cf. Revelation 17:3). So, they destroy her and then burn her city, which would include her sacred buildings and her precious resources (oil), thereby leaving her barren.

Moreover, the harlot’s destruction is an act that fulfills biblical prophecy. Apostle John writes:

And the ten horns that you saw, they and the beast will [be the very ones to] hate the harlot (the idolatrous woman); they will make her cheerless (bereaved, desolate), and they will strip her and eat up her flesh and utterly consume her with fire. For God has put it into their hearts to carry out His own purpose by acting in harmony in surrendering their royal power and authority to the beast, until the prophetic words (intentions and promises) of God shall be fulfilled. (Revelation 17:16-17, AMP; cf. Ezekiel 16:37 and 39; Revelation 18:8, 17 and 19)

Having said all that, the rest of the bad news is that Egypt, Edom, Moab, Ammon, and every other Gentile nation that has rebelled against God is going to be punished, including the seven consecutive kingdoms that have tried to destroy Israel—the Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian (the Lion/Iraq), Persian (the Bear/Iran), Grecian (the Leopard), Roman, and Ottoman Empires. These empires are the seven heads mentioned in Revelation chapters 12, 13 and 17.

For sure, these seven heads with ten horns are at once Apostle John’s scarlet Beast (the horrific eighth empire, the Dragon or Satan, and the Antichrist, which come out of the resurrected seventh kingdom). Furthermore, Apostle John’s eighth head/scarlet Beast, which is a composite of the successive seven ruling anti-Semitic kingdoms, equals Prophet Daniel’s fourth Beast. This Beast for so long has been the one that biblical prophecy scholars erroneously have declared would be a revived Roman Empire.

There are numerous reasons why the above-mentioned Beast cannot be a reincarnation of the Roman Empire, especially not where the European territories or western leg of that empire are concerned. The western leg disintegrated politically, economically, and militarily nearly a thousand years before the Ottoman Empire defeated the Byzantine Empire. Even though the eastern leg, which became known as the Eastern Roman Empire or the Byzantine Empire, centered around Constantinople/Byzantium/Istanbul located in Turkey, lasted until 1453, this portion of the Roman Empire also gradually declined politically. Additionally, the Byzantine Empire became isolated from the rest of Europe.

Consequently, the most important reason why there will not be a revival of the Roman Empire’s western or European leg is because Europe’s political and military world supremacy no longer exists. In fact, two World Wars, economic and political crises, individual European states’ defense budget cuts, and a loss in momentum for a united Europe are key factors that explain why Europe’s reign as the dominant political and military superpower has declined.

Now, since the biblical signs are pointing to the imminent return of Jesus the Christ, then the nearness of the Lord’s Second Coming means that, right now, Europe is way too weak, politically and militarily speaking, for it to become an overnight dominant global power. For sure, it would take far too many years before Europe could ever be in another world dominance position, if ever; indeed, not one country in Europe qualifies to be the rising Beast, for not one European country is currently strong enough to be considered a politically and militarily dominant world power.

Therefore, since Europe, Italy or even Rome’s present-day political and military factors indicate that most biblical prophecy scholars were wrong about an end time revived Roman Empire, then the question that should come to mind is: Who is the Prophet Daniel and Apostle John’s Beast? Once again, Apostle John’s head number eight and Prophet Daniel’s Beast number four are the Beast with seven heads and ten horns, and this Beast will be the Islamic Empire, which is the reincarnation of head number 7 or the Ottoman Empire (a.k.a., Turkish/Islamic Empire).

Moreover, since this eighth head or “Beast” empire will be a revival of the seventh head/empire, it is reasonable to infer that the Republic of Turkey will play a key role in end-time prophecy, simply because Istanbul (a.k.a., Constantinople/Byzantium) in Turkey, was the capital city of both the Byzantine Empire and the Ottoman Empire. NOTE:  the Republic of Turkey is no longer considered to be solely an eastern European nation, for today it is a country on the Eurasian supercontinent.

Concerning the eighth head or Beast empire, the Apostle John describes this presently rising Beast in several Scriptures found in Revelation. Here are a few of those Scriptures:

And then another Sign alongside the first: a huge and fiery Dragon! It had seven heads and ten horns, a crown on each of the seven heads. With one flick of its tail it knocked a third of the Stars from the sky and dumped them on earth. The Dragon crouched before the Woman in childbirth, poised to eat up the Child when it came. ~ Revelation 12:3-4, MSG

and

The ten horns you saw are ten kings, but they’re not yet in power. They will come to power with the Scarlet Beast, but won’t last long—a very brief reign. These kings will agree to turn over their power and authority to the Beast. They will go to war against the Lamb but the Lamb will defeat them, proof that he is Lord over all lords, King over all kings, and those with him will be the called, chosen, and faithful. ~ Revelation 17:12-14, MSG

Now, if superpower stature is measured by military, economic, political, and cultural criteria, as well as measured by a country’s landmass, population, well-developed nuclear capacity, and/or its strategic plan that might include the possibility of destroying the world, then several Arabic nations are (or on the threshold of becoming) superpowers. Case in point, most Muslim countries fit the military, economic, political, cultural, landmass, population criteria, and they have either already begun a nuclear program, or they have nuclear power plants under construction, or they will begin building nuclear plants this year. Indeed, Iran, Syria, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia,  are just a few Muslim countries that are rising superpowers.

Of the above-mentioned promising superpowers, Syria and Saudi Arabia are two of the Beast’s ten horns that are described by the psalmist Asaph. Asaph’s 10 future ruling powers are:

The tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites, of Moab and the Hagrites, Gebal and Ammon and Amalek, the Philistines, with the inhabitants of Tyre. Assyria also has joined with them; they have helped the children of Lot [the Ammonites and the Moabites] and have been an arm to them. Selah [pause, and calmly think of that]! ~ Psalm 83:6-8, AMP

Below are the ancient names, mentioned nearly 3,000 years ago by the Psalmist Asaph, along with their modern-day names:

1.  Tents of EDOM = [descendants of Esau], who today are Palestinian Refugees and Southern Jordanians

2.  ISHMAELITES = [descendants of Abraham and Hagar], who today are Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians, Iraqis, North Africans (Libyans and Northern Sudanese), and Saudi Arabians, who, as Arabs, are said to be the only remaining peoples with Ishmaelite blood in them

3.  MOAB = [descendants of Lot], who today are Palestinian Refugees and Central Jordanians

4.  HAGRITES = [descendants of Abraham and Hagar], who today live in northern Jordan, east of Gilead

5.  BYBLOS/GEBAL = today’s Hezbollah and Northern Lebanese

6.  AMMON = [descendants of Lot], who today are Palestinian Refugees and Northern Jordanians

7.  AMALEK = today’s Arabs in Sinai Peninsula

8.  PHILISTIA/PHILLISTINES = today’s Palestinian Refugees and Hamas of Gaza Strip

9.  Inhabitants of TYRE = today’s Hezbollah and Southern Lebanese

10.  ASSYRIA = today’s Syrians, Turks, and Northern Iraqis

        —Children of Lot = MOAB and AMMON

NOTE: Psalm 83 (minus the three horns that are removed to make room for the Antichrist) plus the nations/peoples/areas mentioned in Ezekiel 38-39 are the ten toes on Nebuchadnezzar’s statue, which means the ten-nation confederacy that invades Israel, without a doubt, will be ONE invasion (Psalm 83 invasion and Ezekiel 38-39 invasion of Gog and Magog are the same invasion, which means some of Psalm 83 nations/peoples/areas are included in the “and many nations with you” of Ezekiel 38:15). Moreover, without a doubt, this ten-nation confederacy that invades Israel also will be the Revived Islamic Caliphate (see Mystery Babylon and A Revived Roman Empire Is Unlikely)!

Map of Ancient Phoenician *City-States Around 830 B.C.

The prophecies about the Lord destroying these ten horns (ten enemies of God and of His chosen people) will be completely fulfilled, but first, as already mentioned, three of these horns will rebel against the Little Horn (Antichrist) and he will dispose of them by taking away their authority and then dividing up (assigning, distributing) their lands, thereby making their people fugitives. Based on biblical prophecies, the three horns that the Antichrist uproots from their position of authority are, once again, Edom, Moab, and Ammon. The Prophet Daniel writes:

He shall enter into the Glorious Land [Palestine] and many shall be overthrown, but these shall be delivered out of his hand: Edom, Moab, and the main [core] of the people of Ammon. ~ Daniel 11:41, AMP

The above verse is speaking about the Antichrist, who recently has returned to the “Glorious Land,” specifically to Jerusalem, his headquarters. He came from Mecca where he destroyed the harlot of Babylon (Mecca), and burned her city and oil resources. He then went into the rebuilt Jewish Temple and declared himself to be like god, which has created much furor throughout Israel.

At this point, the peace treaty with Israel has been broken. Indeed, the Scriptures say that the Antichrist now has been “… permitted to wage war on God’s holy people (the saints) and to overcome them. And power was given him to extend his authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation” (Revelation 13:7), which he soon does but not before he murders the two witnesses and leaves their dead bodies in Jerusalem’s street. The remnant Messianic Jews have started to flee to Petra for safety, where the remnant  Gentiles from Edom, Moab, and Ammon also have come.

Now, concerning the Gentile fugitives, the Prophet Isaiah writes:

Let our outcasts of Moab dwell among you; be a sheltered hiding place to them from the destroyer. When the extortion and the extortioner have been brought to nought, and destruction has ceased, and the oppressors and they who trample men are consumed and have vanished out of the land, Then in mercy and loving-kindness shall a throne be established, and One shall sit upon it in truth and faithfulness in the tent of David, judging and seeking justice and being swift to do righteousness. ~ Isaiah 16:4-5, AMP

Jesus the Christ prophesies about the flight of end time Messianic Jews, He says:

So when you see the appalling sacrilege [the abomination that astonishes and makes desolate], spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the Holy Place–let the reader take notice and ponder and consider and heed [this]–Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; Let him who is on the housetop not come down and go into the house to take anything; And let him who is in the field not turn back to get his overcoat. And alas for the women who are pregnant and for those who have nursing babies in those days! Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a Sabbath. For then there will be great tribulation (affliction, distress, and oppression) such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now–no, and never will be [again]. And if those days had not been shortened, no human being would endure and survive, but for the sake of the elect (God’s chosen ones) those days will be shortened. ~ Matthew 24:15-22; cf. Luke 21:20-23.

Lastly, Apostle John writes about the Messianic Jews who flee to a desert place of safety (in Petra) where they are taken care of for a certain amount of time. He writes, “And the woman [herself] fled into the desert (wilderness), where she has a retreat prepared [for her] by God, in which she is to be fed and kept safe for 1,260 days (42 months; three and one-half years)” ~ Revelation 12:6, AMP.

Certainly, Isaiah 16:4-5 specifically is about the Moabite fugitives, a remnant of Gentile people who live in harmony with the remnant Messianic Jews (Matthew 24:15-22; Revelation 12:6), who help their old nemesis. However, as mentioned earlier, Jordan always has represented a place of refuge and safety for all people. That is why it stands to reason that during the last 3½ years of the Tribulation Period the remnant of Israel will find refuge from the Antichrist in Petra, which is located in Edom, now Southern Jordan. It also stands to reason that some time after the Messianic Jews, the surviving Tribulation saints, find safety in Petra that the remnant Ammonites (those outcasts who once gave refuge to King David, his family, and his military escorts), come there for peace and safety, too. The remnant Edomites, however, probably were already there, and, thus, they no doubt are the ones who permit the Messianic Jews entrance into Petra, for, again, Petra is in Edom!

Once the Tribulation Period is over, however, and Jesus the Christ destroys the Antichrist, peace and safety for the hiding survivors of the Tribulation Period also will be over. As promised, the Lord will judge the Tribulation survivors, which includes the remnant Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites, and He will deal with them accordingly. Judgment will result in an even smaller amount of these populations who will be left standing in the presence of the Lord. The Prophet Isaiah writes:

But now the Lord has spoken, saying, Within three years, as the years of a hireling [who will not serve longer than the allotted time], the glory of Moab shall be brought into contempt, in spite of all his mighty multitudes of people; and the remnant that survives will be very small, feeble, and of no account. ~ Isaiah 16:14, AMP

As this Scripture indicates, not only the remnant Moabites but also the remnant Edomites and Ammonites become fugitives living in Petra, along with the Messianic Jews who flee from the wrath of the Antichrist/Dragon of Revelation 12, and the Gentiles stay there for at least 3 years. However, God’s Word is very clear about the pride/glory of Moab being the reason why many of these tribulation survivors receive judgment after Armageddon is over. For sure, it stands to reason that judgment also will come to the people of Edom and Ammon, as well as all of the surviving people from the world’s rebelling nations.

The Prophet Isaiah describes this wrath of God, as God coming from Edom with His robe stained in the blood of His enemies (cf. Isaiah 63:1-3). Furthermore, Jeremiah 25:15-33 confirms this bloody image, when he addresses those populations who will receive the cup (wine) of God’s wrath—the cup filled with blood. Those who specifically will drink from the cup of God’s wrath, which is His end-time judgment, are:

Pharaoh king of Egypt, his servants, his princes, all his people, And all the mixed foreign population; all the kings of the land of Uz; and all the kings of the land of the Philistines and [their cities of] Ashkelon, Gaza, Ekron, and the remnant of Ashdod; Edom, Moab, and the children of Ammon; All the kings of Tyre, all the kings of Sidon, and the kings of the islands and the coastlands across the [Mediterranean] Sea; Dedan, Tema, Buz [neighboring tribes north of Arabia], and all who clip off the corners of their hair and beards; All the kings of Arabia and all the kings of the mixed foreign people who dwell in the desert; All the kings of Zimri, all the kings of Elam (Persia), and all the kings of Media; All the kings of the north, far and near, one after another–and all the kingdoms of the world which are on the face of the earth. And after them the king of Sheshach (Babel or Babylon) shall drink. ~ Jeremiah 25:19-26, AMP; cf. Isaiah 34:1-11 (underlining is this writer’s emphasis)

Additionally, once Armageddon is over, and the Tribulation survivors are then gathered around the Lord’s throne, more judgment is given. This time, Jesus the Christ judges by separating the sheep from the goats, and the chaff from the wheat. Thus, any surviving Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites, who only pretended to accept Jesus the Christ as Lord and Savior so that they could get into a safe place on earth, will be those individuals who also will drink the cup of God’s wrath, this time His final judgment, which is eternal punishment in the Lake of Fire! Indeed, even the Antichrist/Beast, False Prophet, and Dragon/Satan will meet their final end there (cf. wheat from tares in Matthew 13:36-42; and sheep from goats in Matthew 25:31-46; Antichrist/Beast and False Prophet’s end in Revelation 19:20; and Dragon/Satan’s end in Revelation 20:10).

In contrast, those remnant Edomites, Moabites, and Ammonites who truly embraced the King of Israel and became companions of the remnant of Israel will enter into the Lord’s millennial kingdom (e.g., similar to how Ruth, a Moabite who made the choice to befriend Naomi and the choice to serve the God of Israel. As a result, she not only is saved from destruction but also she is given a place in Jesus the Christ’s lineage, as King David’s great grandmother).

Lastly, even though the Little Horn, ten horns, and other Tribulation nations/populations might survive the Tribulation Period, this good news will be trumped by the bad news that the saints will be separated from the ain’ts! For sure, Jesus the Christ keeps His promise to judge all of the Tribulation survivors before He sets up His 1,000-year kingdom. Thus, no one who is left behind, after the Rapture, is completely SAFE from eternal damnation.

For this reason, it is expedient that everyone who is now living on this side of the Rapture, and who does not happen to be a child of God who has accepted Jesus the Christ as Lord and Savior, should take this moment to secure his or her eternal soul. Everyone’s soul, including the souls of those people who have suffered a physical death, will live on eternally in one of two places: 1. in the presence of God, or 2. from the presence of God, eternally tormented in the Lake of Fire. Time is moving swiftly, and soon the world will be under the reign of the Beast with seven heads and ten horns. As Joshua says, “…choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve…” (Joshua 24:15, AMP)!

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Print & PDF (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Rev. Nadine Drayton-Keen

Sanctified Child

KEEN Blogging Days

February 2011
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

KEEN (Weekly) Top Posts

  • It Is Very Meaningful, When God Speaks A Name Twice
  • HARPAZO (Rapture, Take, Snatch, Force, Pull, Pluck, Catch, Catch Up, Catch Away) Scriptures
  • The Bride of Christ’s Inner, Upper, and Outer Garments
  • Invisible – A Common Phenomenon
  • Three Main Harvests Of Souls
  • The Fruit of the Ruach (Spirit) Is His Work – Not Ours
  • Being Unequally Yoked
  • Raptures = Firstfruits’ Harvests of Souls
  • This Is Me...
  • Prayer

KEEN Topics

Awards Bible Prophecy Bible Study Devotional Faith and Wisdom Heartbreak Heavenly Insights Literary Fiction National Tragedy Poetry Praises and Thanks Published Book Reblogged Review Short Story Spiritual Tribute

Published Book Author

Perfect Peace, published 2-19-2015; collection of my Haiku poetry

Published Book Author

Keeping It Real..., published 10-20-2015; collection of my devotions

My Newest Book

My Spirit's Musings, published 1-9-2017; collection of mostly Free Verse poems

My Mini-Memoir

My mini-memoir deals with love, loss, and forgiveness. Published July 26, 2018.

My Third Collection of Poetry

Moody Woman - published January 12, 2020

A literary fiction debut novel . . .
published January 29, 2022 . . .

My Spirit’s Musings Press Release

Captivating New Xulon Verses Remind Believers Why Only a Christlike Life Reflects God’s Image - Reverend Keen of Deeper Walk Ministries Lyrically Addresses Christlikeness

Very Inspiring Blogger Award

Ambassador for Christ Blogger Award

Deeper Walk Ministries Logo

Serving Others Ministry

KEEN Created Graphic

Fruit of the Spirit

KEEN Created Graphic

Lone Voices Suffer

KEEN Created Graphic

AKA Haiku

KEEN Created Graphic

KEEN Social Media

  • View preachingwoman’s profile on Facebook
  • View sanctifiedchild’s profile on Twitter

KEEN Twitter Followers

My Tweets

KEEN Posts Liked

  • Invisible – A Common Phenomeno… on Gone Fishin'
  • Spring Festival 2022 on Words Like Honey
  • Sunday Soul Search on Words Like Honey
  • Wordless Wednesday on Words Like Honey
  • Sunday Soul Search on Words Like Honey
  • Psychological Invisibility​ (W… on Gone Fishin'
  • Spring Festival 2022~ week 10 on Words Like Honey

KEEN Community of Friends/Visitors

KEEN Blogging History

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

KEEN Visits

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Gone Fishin'
    • Join 1,728 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Gone Fishin'
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: